Digital storytelling follows a strict rubric of how stories should be organized and Lambert makes it clear that certain forms of social media and Youtube fail to meet the criteria in order to be defined as digital stories. This strict adherence to form and structure contrasts with the concept of digital humanities. Digital humanities aim to be inclusive and broaden the understanding of what constitutes digital humanities seen by the debate surrounding alt-ac positions being categorized as within digital humanities.
Although the two are distinct, they share many of the same goals of collaboration and redefining the common practices whether in media or academia. Both of these fields note the transformations in society that are shaping our understanding of the digital. Lambert questions, “As we look five or ten years ahead, we recognize the word digital has less and less meaning…So if everything is digital, is Digital Storytelling a less-and-less useful idea?” (Lambert 138). Lambert notes the ways in which digital storytelling are linked to historical methods of storytelling in oral traditions, but digital storytelling is a more recent transformation built upon this history. In “The Digital Humanities or a Digital Humanism” Dave Parry also describes the way in which the digital has become inseparable from our society. Parry states, “There is no studying of the humanities separate from the digital. To study the humanities (or any kind of socially relevant, engaged-in-the-present object of inquiry) necessitates a realization that the world is now digital…the idea of studying itself is altered by the existence of the digital” (Gold 436).
Digital storytelling and digital humanities acknowledge how the digital is now mainstream and a part of our daily lives, but within different contexts. Digital humanities seek to note the transformation of society in order to create better approaches to scholarship and understand the ways in which the structure of academia should be challenged. Digital storytelling has a similar narrative in striving to challenge the way in which media is produced and who is depicted, but because of the way our society is now digital there are several other forms that challenge this narrative and I believe that even more will emerge.
In Bethany Nowviskie’s blog post titled “What do Girls Dig?” she states, “A little attention to audience and rhetoric can go a long way toward making applications and results of digital methods seem comprehensible, inspiring, and potentially transformative” (Gold 240). Even though this was said in regards to the digital humanities it may apply to both subjects. Accessibility is crucial to have the largest impact, this is something digital storytelling is very active in addressing and is a prominent debate within digital humanities. Both are seeking to challenge dominant narratives in order to give voice to others with the potential to have a very significant impact in transforming the accepted forms of media or scholarship.